By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Abun on 14 October 2015
Edit Thread
tripenfall said:
Ka-pi96 said:
tripenfall said:
Halo showed that a FPS could be as good on a console (if not better) than a PC so in that regard the XBOX was
very influential. The problem with the console IMO was that other than Halo 2 no other games match the quality of the launch title. A bit of a let down there.
Also first XBOX controller was a turd.... And the size and weight of the console itself yikes!
Despite some good ideas and high specs the PS2 ruled the day.

Do Call of Duty, Medal of Honour, Timesplitters, Half-Life, Red Faction etc not count? Or are you just calling them all crap?


Not calling them crap but they weren't as good and did not have the impact that Halo had. At the time the FPS genre was dominated by PC and

upon it's release the best FPS in the business was on console. It was the "killer app" that a new console needs to convince people to get on board.

I also see I'm copping some flack here for not mentioning Goldeneye - for that I'm truly sorry it was a masterclass! It's just that most people played Goldeneye with the single analog stick (although you can use the C buttons too) and it felt like a console game whereas Halo used the dual stick controller and until then it was believed nothing beat a keyboard / mouse combo. Halo shut a few PC gamers up with that. Also that 733mhz processor was quick for the day!


Not as good is laughable,because they were better but they did not have the impact because Sony did not need them to sell their console and did not use them to promote like MS needed Halo.Halo is not as great as people make it,it was just all MS had and still has so it is over hyped.The Dual stick would not even exit if not for the PSX so the dual shock gave birth to Halo and Red Faction used it first before Halo and felt great with it as did other FPS games.