By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheWPCTraveler said:
No. Even if the third-parties hold their system up for them, it's better to spread the titles out in order to ensure maximum sales potential for each and every title.

Plus, well, do you really want to spend $300 on games in a single month?


Agree. One thing Sony could do about this, though, is delaying some of the titles originally planned to launch before that still have too many quality problems, to fix as many of them as possible, and use just these titles to pack the last months. But droughts must be avoided, gamers don't like them at all and they can cause immediate and longer term negative effects, so at most one big title and three or four lesser ones should be delayed, if necessary, and use resources freed in the short term to fix the other titles as quick as necessary to launch them in the originally planned date or at worst not many days after.
After all I really doubt their original high season schedule can have more than four holes to plug.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW!