Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
You gave your reasons to why companies make remasters being wrong on 2/3 of the reasons 1) they are not low effort, they can be done with a smaller team however 2) they are not low cost., that's like the Majority and stuff, you basically failed the exam, you got like a 30% . And PR is PR, you only add the word spin to add a negative connotation to it. In order to make PR, a morally neutral advertising tactic, look bad (THE DEFINITION OF DEMONIZING ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)) in this case because you vehemently disagree with the concept of remasters despite it having little measurable effect on your life. The only reason people ever call PR spin is because they believe it is misleading, that's your opinion not the "real reason" My "defense" is just tearing down your """""offense""""" if you could even call it that, that's the real laugable part about this whole thing. |
1) If they can be done by smaller teams than they're a low effort. WW HD was made in 6 months. It's a low effort.
2) They're much cheaper to produce than new games.
I don't disagree with the concept of remasters, they make a lot of sense from a business perspective (see my 3 reasons). As a gamer though, I don't care much about them.
I call it spin because he's spinning. More than 90% of the PS3 owners didn't play Uncharted 3. If they weren't interested in it then, chances are they won't be interested in it now. Games don't start off with a 100% attach ratio lmao.
You're not tearing down anything except your credibility with posts like that.
Oh and I'll lead you to this thread if you think Sony doesn't care about their first party line-up.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=208911&page=1
