Ka-pi96 said:
Ruler said:
Ka-pi96 said:
No where does it say it's any other way. And considering I can't see any options to change the language on the site it's fair to assume that it is aimed towards English speaking people.
Besides, why do you think some languages 'aren't allowed'? Could it not just be that no reviewers using that language have bothered to apply? I mean, why would they? It's not as if their reviews being shown to people that can't understand a word they are saying is going to increase their traffic at all.
|
I know that for a fact because you can see sometimes famitsu in some reviews. I think they add famitsu later when the western reviewers are allready done.
But if you look at japanese games who arent released in the west normally famitsu and other japanese sites should have the review out first because it released in japan first right, but they dont show up? The conclusion is that they only add famitsu if there allready done which is also rarley by the way, and no other japanese sites i have seen besides famitsu. And you dont see any other languages from none-western sites. Is this coincedence? i highly doubt it
|
Metacritic are bad cuz no non-English reviews.... except sometimes I see famitsu reviews.
Great argument there...
|
famitsu is bigger than most other sites icluding IGN and gamespot maybe. Their reviwes should be showed as some of the first and all the time. Like i said it is rarley showing up. There are a lot of more japanese review sites who arent included at all like 4gamer.net
My argument is valied. How can the second biggest Videogame market (3rd if you include China) being so misrepresented?
