ils411 said:
Wrong. For many consumers, its a way to get an Xbox One at a cheaper price without the kinect that no one really wanted. they didn't go "hey $399.00 Xbox one without kinect!! price cut!" they went "hey! xbox one for $399.00 WITHOUT KINECT! HELLZ YEAH!!!" And yes, it does make a difference, its a matter of lower price with lesser value. but most of the early adopters are the core gamers and don't care for kinect, hence the perception that the removal of kinect didn't change the value. if the kinect bundle was reduced in price to $399 and the without kinect one was $349, you can bet your ass that everyone will be willing to shell out the extra $50 for the kinect coz of greater value. considering that there was only 1 cut, thats not that big a deal. what makes it a big deal is the fact that MS had to cut the price so soon after launch. much like how nintendo was forced to cut the price of the O3Ds so soon after release due to crapy sales. |
most cosumers would say what's kinect?
not really since many people were pissed they had to pay more before for something they didn't want
once again they cut the minimum price of entry twice. The fact they cut the kinect out doesn't change the fact that the price of entry was reduced. The fact they were willing to stop making kinect madatory so soon means all those that had it before were stuck with some hardware that is going to be getting much less suport from then on.








