| Dravenet7 said: Maybe I too imprecise with what I said. Diverge from the topic sounds a bit clearer. What the devs was not actually address what he rant directly, which was about the extremely dangerous risk in the set up more than anything else. Instead, they used the key words "conventional", "innovative", and highlighted "rules" themselves in order to implicate that the saftey standard was a relic of the past. They then went on with a video that further strays from the rant; It shows a method generation rather than regulation.
Considering the Destiny thing and the April Fools content, they are more than likely just joking. I dont know if they in fact are efensive and this is the way the defend themselves from criticsm as Versus claims. Hence my line, "I don't know. I think in this case its good Versus_Evil." |
"in order to implicate that the saftey standard was a relic of the past."
I guess we just see this very differently. Personally, I'm like 1000% certain the entire email was a tongue-in-cheek response and I salute the developers for that.
