Goatseye said:
Halo4 has a meta of 87. Competent studios are handed out their competency certificate at what score? One thing people that are "concerned" about Halo never understand is, how vast the Halo universe is. Xbox 360 had 2 Halo games starring Master Chief, others had more than two in 4 years. Halo 4 is criticized because it deviated from H3 gameplay formula and 343i coupled the games with the lore, unlike Bungie. I don't expect you to know that. |
I stopped playing Halo after ODST... it was a good place to let go for me.
I don't take meta's all that seriously, especially when it comes to MS backed games. Titanfall, Evolve, Gears and several others have burned me over the years when I listened to the likes of IGN give MCC a ninety-something and then hear about all the issues for them only to say... "there is so much content it doesnt matter..." MS and their studios always seem to get a free pass.
On the other hand I played the beta for Destiny and loved it and still do. Driveclub was lambasted by the same critics who lauded Evolve and Titanfall yet I have loved every minute I played DC.
Watch Dogs was one of the only ones aligned with PS that came in overrated...
Anyway 7 Halo games over the 360 lifespan is crazy...