Halo 5 has a ROCK SOLID performance (Digital Foundry)

[Zekkyou]

Jazz2K said:

Zekkyou said:

No one here is claiming that a full 1080p is an inherent necessity, so let's not throw the thread into a discussion there's obviously no need for. There's a very big difference between someone feeling that, and simply believe [x] would have been better than [y]. The whole point in a new generation is to expand on what [x] and [y] can be, and there is will always be disagreement as to how to balance those potential new progressions. Such discussion is healthy (if a little repetitive at times :p).

No one is directly claiming it but seeing how it bother so many that a game isn't 1080 is telling. Talk about a positive to a game and as soon as some realise it's not 1080 then 10 pages later they still argue about the quality of the game even if the rest is great. How many threads have we got on the subject? How many sites make their bread and butter on the subject? Yea it tells a lot. Some even go as far as saying 1080p is necessary to aim in shooters... as if they started playing games last week.  I don't think positive threads turning into huge arguments over some minor graphical fidelity is any healthy imo. 

If you talk about one technical aspect, the others will come up too, good and bad. It's hardly just resolution either. If Halo 5 was 1080p/30fps, we'd inevitably have a different group complaining it wasn't 60fps. Or if it was an unstable 60fps, we'd have others saying they'd rather it be a locked 30fps, and so forth.

If you aren't interested in people expressing what technical balances they prefer, don't enter threads where it's a natural extension of the topic (in this particular case it's a part of the actual source it's built upon). Again, there's not need to throw this thread into a discussion there's no need for. By all means express why you agree or disagree with the various views expressed here, but don't mock the views themselves.