generic-user-1 said:
i dont think pathfinder is such a great IP, and they didnt get fallout 4 1/2. so i guess he was bored. he wasnt heavly invested in pillars(you know if you played it, its a good game but in no way his game).
they should have made fallout 4(i bet the game will be as shitty as fallout 3 and not as grand as fallout new vegas), it would have been so great, with perfect humor and not stupid plotlines. |
Well, Pathfinder is as close as we'll get to them making D&D I guess in near future, that's why I said it's important license.
As for Pillars, yeah, really good game, but not as good as those gems from the Black Isle/Bioware's era...let's wait and see how Numenera turns out, for some strange reason, from the reveal I was expecting it to top Pillars.
I'm not that harsh on Fallout 3, sure, it is nowhere near the greatness of Fallout 1/2, but I see the way it turned out as Bethesda's inherent incompetance in being nuanced, clever and refined, and not being dicks to fans of franchise on purpose (unlike some other devs - *cough* Tomb Raider *cough*).
Honestly, I think Obsidian should just invent new Fallout cRPG (under fdifferent name of course), after all, I think most of the key people who created F1/2 are with them (while we're at wishful thinking, new Vampire the Masquarade wouldn't hurt either).







