| Andres9888 said: I don't think a FPS would be would be good for 10 dollars. There is a huge number of good ones that are already out and people are willing to spend more then 10 for one. I think for 10 DLC I would go for either unquie artistic/cartoony games or good party games that you can pick up and play. |
I don't follow your logic...
I enjoy FPS's a lot, but I don't value most games past being worth $25 to actually go out and buy it. If the game were decent, even as crappy as Goldeneye by today's standards, I'd pay $10 for a shooter-fix than $60 for a spankin' FPS that I may not finish the first 10 hours of play (I never finished Halo 1 campaign, but I certainly played multi out the kazoo... played lots of others, but some I just get distracted for whatever reason).
Id' be willing to buy an FPS for 10 dollars if it "didn't suck" and had something to offer. I'm not willing to spend "much more anyway" on $60 shooters. (Last one I officialy bought as mine was RE4:Wii for $30 (?)). Room mates have Halo 3, Vegas and Resistance.
Me: "Willing to pay 10, but not 25, 50 or 60" (RE4:Wii is exceptional and more complete to begin with)
Numbers: Checker Players > Halo Players
Checkers Age and replayability > Halo Age and replayability
Therefore, Checkers > Halo
So, Checkers is a better game than Halo.
