Soundwave said:
spemanig said:
I think you're vastly overexadurating how stupid people are.
They can't tell the difference between a 2016 high end tablet clearly marketed with a 1080p screen and a gaming tablet marketed with a 540p screen? You're literally saying that people are too stupid to read what's on a box. The Wii U gets a ton of shit for being too weak, and that system can still play games at 1080p 60fps, but a tablet with a big fat 540p screen in 2016 will go unnoticed and "99% of people won't tell the difference?" Give me a break. People already complain that the Wii U's gamepad picture qualitly is ugly as shit, and that streams games far more demanding than anything on smartphones or the Vita at the same 540p resolution.
I think the NX will be a break from the Wii-DS, in firmware. In hardware, no. It'll be an iterative upgrade. No tablet. No portable console. And there's definitely internal change happening. But not the sort that'll produce a gaming tablet to replace a dual screen handheld that's part of a unified platform meant to share games seamlessly when the home console is still dual screened.
|
The quality of the screen makes a huge difference. A Vita screen (even the new models) and the Wii U tablet are very close in resolution from a technical sense, but you put them side by side and it's a laughable difference, clearly Nintendo is using really poor quality screens.
|
Vita have 5" screen with 540p resolution = 220 ppi, Wii U gamepad have 6.2" screen with 480p resolution = 158 ppi. It's pretty big difference between 220 ppi and 158 ppi. I currently have phone with 220 ppi display and graphic is pretty good.
Today you dont have poor quality displays, almost all phones are now using IPS or better screens, so resolution is only thing that make big difference.
