By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed on 16 September 2015
Edit Thread
ethomaz said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:

Don't these positive reviews point at something unseemly about Destiny?

"making this the unmissable Bungie title that Destiny should’ve been a year ago"

"Systemically, this is the game Destiny should have been from the beginning"

"More importantly, all of what you get with The Taken King makes sense and seems to draw closer to the original Bungie dream that never came to fruition in the original release"

So the people who dropped $60-$100 for Destiny last September need to spend another $40 to get, to quote Cheat Code Central, "the game Destiny should have been from the beginning"?

I understand celebrating the fact that Destiny is now better, but shouldn't we hold Bungie/Activision responsible for such a cynical business practice?

It is a MMO model.

You can say that about every other MMO game in the world.

It grow and get constant updates... even updates that changes the core of the game... that to make the game always fresh and fun.

Its not an MMO model and you cant say that about every MMO lol. Maybe you just dont have any MMO experience? I cant recall a single MMO that launched with such light content, had expansions that were such jokes, and had so many fundamental design flaws that needed fixing. 

Destiny follows the AAA game model, not the MMO model. It just tries to infuse that model with some MMO flair. There is nothing MMO about Destiny.

That said, lol @ there even being any reviews yet. If the game ends on an 89-90 meta, awesome. But the raid is the big draw and its not even out yet. It would be like publishing a Halo 5 review without MP being available.