Why is the whole gaming journalism on Kojima's d***?

[ghettoglamour]

MTZehvor said:

StreaK said:

Sorry, but I have no choice but to pretend after I post this comment, that I have NOT read your topic.
I find it CRAZY how anyone can possibly think that this game is anything but STUNNING!
A gorgeous open world game at 60fps is mindblowing. To think how beautifully it all plays out is just incredible.
Also, the game doesn't need to concentrate on story anymore. Let it finally be just an awesome game to play. We've already been there and sat through soooooo many 10+ minute cutscenes that it was time for a change. Kojima made that happen. He kept the franchise fresh after so many years and it shows in MGSV. It plays like MGS yet is completely different from the rest. That's why it's praised and rightfully so.

Frickin hell, thank the heavens the critics aren't THIS guy or else we'd be in some serious trouble. He should stay far FAR away from MGS because all his points are ridiculous to me.

If his points are so ridiculous, you should have no problem rebutting them easily. This sort of dismissiveness accomplishes nothing.

A number of his points are valid, too. The story is a huged missed opportunity, one that didn't need 10 minute cutscenes to tell. A story dealing with a hero's descent into villainy with an unending quest for revenge would have been really compelling. And he's certainly not wrong about the recycled missions either, though most of them are optional, the game does a very poor job of explaining that they are optional.

They are? The main ones? Which ones?

Or better, how can you tell by yourself?