By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
generic-user-1 said:
DonFerrari said:
generic-user-1 said:

he needs to finance his own election because he needs the super rich guy image to win it, and to be super rich because the trump brand is his biggest asset and he needs to play richie rich or the brand will die.

and yes, its easy to get realy rich if you inherit a well run big real estate company that has most of its assets in new york.

if he is stupid or a brilliant actor/conman? i dont know, i realy realy dont know, but he isnt a brilliant or even good business person, his company isnt well run and many people with a background like him have the same amount of money he has, if not more.

bloomberg made trump realy rich with his politics in nyc and the boom nyc saw after that, and his example could ruin trump, bloomberg invested just his own money, and run a huge campaigne in nyc, trump isnt able to finance such an campaigne nation wide, and taking money from other guys would destroy his chances to win.  atm he is ahead of everybody and spend the least amount of money, but that will change when the campaigne starts its next stage with the first primarys.


You think he needs... let's see to the end and if no one will donate to his campaigne... He may be richie rich for you, but I could be wrong, but are all his companies 100% owned by him without any shareholder?

Well if it's really easy to become bilionaire in similar circunstance, you certainly could provide a research about how many % of people that had previous generation worth between 20-100M became billionaires, right? Please show me the numers, many is very generic (there are many bilionaires, so everyone should be bilionaire?), I want statistic.

You first say he have a well run, and then say it isn't well run.

Have any campaign costed 10Billion? Perhaps he could, but would be utter silly.

he inherited a well run realestate business with alot of assets in NYC.  if he did nothing and let other people run all, he would have as much hard assets as he has today(or even more). its not so well run today it looks like, other realestate companys made alot more profit in the last 15 years.

and he couldnt finance a campaign because he doenst have the money, his worth isnt wealth, its a image, not more. he cant sell the trump name for 10b dollar or 100m dollar because it cant be sold.

Other real state, ok, in average with all companies he made more or less? And sure the company could have been worst than before, I don't follow his news, but you are assuming them that on average 100M would turn 1B in 15 years?

And why gave you skipped all else?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."