The_Sony_Girl1 said:
starman said:
HoloDust said:
Oh dear...yeah, we should definitely have one version of Spiderman that is straight, one that is bi, one that is gay, etc.
But let's not stop at that - we should have one version where he is black, than one version where he's Chinese, than one version where he is Eskimo.
Than expand onto version where he is polydactylous and to spice it up one where he has siamese twin.
What Stan Lee says, as someone who created Spiderman, is neither idiotic, homophobic or hypocritical. If you want bi/gay/pansexual character, go find one that is already created in certain way (like Captain Holt from Brooklyn Nine-Nine, one of the best characters in last few years in TV shows) , or create your own, do not ask for well established charactes to conform to your believes or you're coming out as close-minded.
|
okay, let's never make a new version of a superhero, just forget it and make a new hero everytime.
you're very close minded and comparing a sexuality change with siamese twins is hugely homophobic. I still wonder why people bithc so much over an invisible and natural difference.
|
Yes we shouldn't make a new version of a hero. Why? Because that would be changing what they are! It would go against years of character development! I mean like at what happened to Iceman! He's unpopular right now, because he became gay, despite being straight for 40 years!
|
I was a fan of Iceman (was my favorite Xman) until I heard about this.There was not need to make Bobby gay out of the blue.It ruined the character and is obviously an agenda to force that lifestyle on people.
