By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
generic-user-1 said:
padib said:
generic-user-1 said:
padib said:
Too many replies guys, I can't keep up.

My basic opinion on this is that the liberties of one are the loss of rights of another. I think this is pretty basic.

She is one of a good portion of americans who believe that homosexuality is a sin, because many americans, especially in the belt, believe in what the bible teaches.

Her belief that it is wrong and should not be promoted is something she wants to see in her society. Unfortunately for her, the rights of homosexuals rule out her right to live in a society that considers homosexuality wrong.

The best way to put it is that the rights of one are the losses of rights of another. Plain and simple.

she can protest gay people all day long, while shes not at WORK.

What if she WORKs as a public servant!? Then she can't work as a public servant given her beliefs because someone (or 4 people) decided to pass a bill.

1. i think its normal that you dont let your personal beliefes influence your work if you are a public servant.

2. she doesnt have the right to have the jobs changed just because she doesnt like parts of the job. if she doesnt like her job or parts of her job, she can go and look for a new job, she isnt forced to be a public servant if she doesnt like it.

I have to get me one of these jobs where I get to do whatever I feel like.  Sounds pretty awesome.