By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

oulW

Soundwave said:
designmaps said:

that quote is totaly vague. what remains is the confirmation of shared architeture for the next systems.

"Also Smash Brothers is probably what Nintendo wants to avoid. Yes you can make two seperate versions of each franchise ... but it's a waste of resources"

how retarded are you? they managed smash bros for 3ds and wii u even with a 50-60x difference in power. you think it will be harder to do something similar when their next handheld and home console will be closer in power (10-15x difference) and have the same architeture?

"and good luck supporting that super duper 2TFLOP+ console you're pining for when you also have to make games seperately for a PSVita+ handheld"

super duper? 2tflops is too low for 2016 and is not gonna happen. psvita is also too low, the 3ds sucessor will have several times the power of a vita.

And again, it seems you keep your terrible idea of sharing ALL software, wich is neither possible nor good. the best aproach for nintendo is make smash, 2d mario, mario kart, animal crossing, splatoon and smaller franchises like kirby, 2d metroid, 2d zelda, fire emblem shared across handheld and home console. basically games that look similar wherever they release and/or are smaller and thus benefit more from a higher installed base. each system would still have it's big exclusives to value the platform.

Apparently not as "retarded" as getting banned from this site and then contiuning to make alt accounts like you, Zero. Buh bye. 


Would Ninty really make a platform that has 3 skus and one of them receive more support than the others(Home console for US/EU receive Nintys support and third party support)?