| padib said: She didn't cause them any harm. They had many other options in front of them. In contrast, she was jailed. That's punishment. The fact that her actions are so blown out of proportion truly go to show that progressivism persecutes one type of person: non-progressivists. @Puppyroach. This should answer your question. If a person refuses to sell shrimp, I don't see the harm in it honestly. |
I think that that could potentially cause harm. I've never been excluded from something based on something inherent before so I cannot really measure it. The non-progressivists are only arrested (or whatever the law implies for the given infraction) when harm is done. Not simply for being non-progressive.
I mean, if we were to go back many decades - should we say didn't black people have other options available to them? I mean they didn't have to use those washrooms or ride on those buses, they could have played other sports or made their own teams.
