By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wright said:


Considering they are still reaping benefits from the success of The Last of Us, cashing in money with the microtransactions present in the multiplayer aspect of their games and more than likely will enjoy a nice boost from the sales of The Nathan Drake Collection, I don't find unreasonable to demand such company that they wait a bit and implement the extra content in the vanilla game.

They can do whatever they want, of course. But that doesn't necessarily means I agree with it just because this is "good DLC". Just like I said in my previous post, Overtime and Infinite in Dead Rising, Ada Wong's Alternate Ways in Resident Evil 4 and Aftermath in Gears of War: Judgment are "good DLC" which happens to be implemented in the main game.

Just no. You can't put demands on a company just because you think it would be a nice idea. The more money ND make, the more Sony can spend on taking risks like Until Dawn. The only mistake you could possibly see here is announcing the DLC prior to the game's release, but it's obvious why companies decide to do that. People aren't going to be able to buy that DLC if they already sold the game.

Edit: 'Good press'? Yes, because that's what ND desparately need. Come on now, this is just looking like greed on your part.



 

The PS5 Exists.