RolStoppable said:
Now you are talking about something else. The truth that I am talking about, for example, is an NFL fan who pretends to have analyzed this Brady case and picks various NFL statements to support his stance and presents all that as an objective point of view. But in reality it's just another hater in disguise. When such a person is lured out of their hiding and begins to say things that remove the doubts that he is a hater, that's what people enjoy. What a lot of people suspected all along gets confirmed as the truth. |
You're right, I hate convicting on bad evidence, or no evidence. Guilty as charged. I guess I just saw way too many examples of thin cases, resulting in horrific acts of brutality throughout American history (Rosewood, comes to mind), for me to think it's a good idea to function in that way.
You should be skeptical of anyone who uses statements from the NFL in this regard. The NFL is part of the case, is it not? How can you assume they're telling the truth? I mean, we already know someone from the league office leaked faulty information to the media on several occassions. And we've got 2 irrefutable examples of Goodell openly lying in the process of the case.
The amount of time I spent looking at everything in this, was pretty substantial. And I actually moved away from normal sources (Given I couldn't trust NE writers, or NFL writers to any level of certainty), and tried to find someone who could be considered as impartial as possible (Across the entire country, in fact), who was an admitted fan of another team, no less.
