CosmicSex said:
Chasesdaddy84 said:
Haven't read all of the comments (so maybe this was mentioned) but I saw something on the news that seemed relevant.. Back in the 60's during school integration there was a similar situation where a person in a position of authority refused to enforce the Supreme Court ruling of school segregation to be illegal. That person was jailed. It is no different here. She is in a position to serve and follow the law of the land. She is going against the Supreme Court, against the United States of America, and against the Law. She absolutely needs to be jailed. Either that or be deported since she clearly is against the Constitution of the United States. Also failing to do her job. Mainly, and most saddening, she is failing at her own Religion. She has been divorced how many times? She should be stoned, cast away, looked down upon according to her own religion. She is a hypocritical bigot. It's so sad I've actually seen a few people defend her!! Even Bill O'Reiley (Fox News) condemned her and her actions and told her to "do her job!" when even the most bigoted on the Right are against you... you're probably a pretty sh*tty person.
|
The questions regarding her being jailed have been addressed. It basiclly has to do with contempt. What good would a court be if they could not back up an order. Well, that is basically what happened here. If you disrespect or ignore an order from a court, you can be found in contempt and jailed. This happens ALL OF THE TIME and even in civil courts for the former reason. If you act up in court you will be thrown in jail. I promise you. If the court gives and order and you ignore it, you will be jailed. Its beyond her not doing her job. Its the disrepect and defiance she showed the courts that made this possible.
|
Yeah, the only difference between this and most contempt cases, and the gamble Kim clearly was trying to play, is that she expected the courts to balk at holding her in contempt because she feels she's exercising her religious beliefs. Obviously Mrs. Davis:
