JEMC said:
I have a hard time believing that neither Nano nor the Fury cards will improve things for AMD. Leaving Fury X aside (because unless space is a problem the Fury X is a poor choice over the similarly priced but better performing 980Ti), it's true that Fury is a good card as it offers better performance than the Vanilla 980 while costing a bit more and almost the same performance of its Fury X sibbling while costing $100 less, but Nano... Nano has the same specs (4096 SP, 4GB, etc.) and price of Fury X, but its power consumption is 100 W lower and yet somehow it's supposed to go "up to 1,000 MHz", only 50 MHz slower than Fury X? I really, really doubt it. Even with the best of the best chips, it will have to run a lot slower than that claimed speed, and that will limit its performance a lot, making it pointless. |
AMD has already stated that the base clock will be around 850mhz and 1ghz will only be achieved in bursts. Still, even 850mhz is quite an achievement for that TDP. First benches give the card a performance slightly ahead of the Fury (non X) and is apparently very quiet.