By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tachikoma said:
Samus Aran said:
DerNebel said:
Samus Aran said:
It's ok when Naughty Dog does it. UC4 will still get 95%+ on metacritic even though every other developer would get slammed for this.

What score would Super Mario Maker have gotten if it had micro-transactions to purchase additional enemies, power-ups, etc.?

If that is all you have to add here, then just leave the thread.

The reactions in this thread more than prove my statement.

But hey, enjoy that hat bundle at $7.

Weren't you upset that co-op was locked behind a $15 amiibo in Shovel Knight? I guess pay-to-win online multiplayer is better?

An entire game mode for $15 that affects gameplay versus cosmetic hat packs for $7, that don't affect gameplay.

 

Hmm let me see..

Yeah, everyone just loves that co-op in 2D platformers (it affects gameplay for the worst btw). Better perks and weapons ruin the online for people who don't want to pay for it. So it's ten times worse. Adding a co-op mode doesn't ruin the experience for other people who don't buy it. But yeah, as far as amiibo unlocked content goes, it's garbage.

Also, at least you get a cool looking figurine for that $15.

Not that I would buy anything SK related mind you.

$7 for a couple of hats is just crazy expensive when I bought the Metroid Prime Trilogy for $10.