HoloDust said:
Not really famliliar with how clerks come to their position in US, or whether or not they can be fired. Arresting someone for something like this instead of seeking other solution seems to me like dangerous precedent. |
It's a unique situation, she's elected to her office, she's not hired in a traditional sense. Before the Judge decided to have her remanded to Marshal custody, they discussed that she'd received funds for her legal battle (though, she hadn't publicly asked for funds), so the court reasonably assumed that fining her, wouldn't actually impact her. It's not entirely a dangerous precedent, really, because it's been done in the past. This, as I said, was unique, because it's an elected official, refusing the SCOTUS ruling, as well as an appeal ruling.







