By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon said:

 

I think the differences are not so big between those pictures, except for Mario Galaxy, that looks beautifull thanks to the wonderfull artstyle but is obviously the most outdated in those pics.

I know WiiU can do way better than Star Fox Zero graphics, but people is always making hyperboles about it, the game does not look like a n64, or a GC or a Wii game, it looks like a 360 game from 2008, wich is outdated and dissapointing but nothing close to what many people is saying. 

Seriously. The amount of hyperbole in this thread is down right appalling. This game looks pretty good but it's no graphical marvel that may take on it.

But to say that it's basically a N64, GCN or even a Wii game just floors me.  It basically looks like you said, a PS3/360 game from a couple of years ago. To me, as long as it plays nice and smooth I have little issue with the graphics. 

 

And while I understand that the Wii U is capable of much more, for example MK 8, Nintendo was probably alot more willing to invest in making MK8 look more graphically impressive knowing that it would sell well. Why invest so much time in a game that might not be able to make back a big investment?