Should EA continue to ignore Nintendo?

[MikeRox]

RubberWhistleHistle said:

spemanig said:

No, it sounds like YOU want it to be true. These are monothithic money making entities, not teens in a high school drama. EA isn't holding a grugde because Nintendo bullied them back in elementary school, EA is making a rational business decision not to support a failed platform no one else is supporting. They are just the ones who were smart enough to do it first. Ubisoft did the same thing with some family game for the Wii U, and similar things happen all the time. This isn't even the 100th time that something like this has happened.

And they obviously would not have made money on it, like with the AssCreeds, and SC: Blacklist, and Most Wanted, and everything else that was a money sink on the Wii U.

i feel like youre really just thinking about this whole situation in a one dimensional type of way. think outside of the box a little bit. i have not claimed to know what is going on in this situation like you have, so i dont understand why you are saying that i want XYZ to be true. is considering all options all of the sudden the same as wanting something to be true? 

again, i wouldnt be surprised if there was something deeper going on. you on the other hand seem to be DEAD FUCKING SET in whatever you think.

I'll just cite the Dreamcast port of Half Life as the previous example of a game being 100% complete and not released.

Even more concerning, Flintstones: Viva Rock Vegas. That went as far as having review copies shipped and didn't release on Dreamcast.