By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PDF said:
Jimbo1337 said:

And yet you and everyone else cannot give me a simple reason why they would vote for someone like this out of all of the times that I posted this comment.

I don't think people on here get it at all when 412 people have voted for her on this site alone shown here:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=207223&page=1#

Why vote for Hillary? 

1. She shares the same ideals as me.

2. She has arguable the strongest resume out of any cadidates

3. Honestly you kind of do get two for the price of one with Bill Clinton.

The FBI issue to you keep pointing to is really not that big of a deal to me.  The disagreement on what is or isnt classified seems to come down to disagreement among government agencies.  Everything found so far to be "classified" was not clearly marked classified when she had in on her private server.  As far as this trust issue she has.  Its a real one but for me particularly I don't trust most politicians.  Reagan flat lied to the American people about Iran-Contra before coming clean.  Most republicans would say he was a great president.

What ideals are those exactly, changing her mind and lying to say whatever is applicable and works at the time?  If her last name were Jones instead of Clinton,  her resume would be vapor.  Two for the price of one, are we electing Hilary or are we re-electing Bill Clinton?  Why not elect a Bush then hell, that's like three for the price of one.

A presidential candidate being investigated by the FBI for distinctly breaking the law (a crime we've watched several others get crucified and lose their career over) and having a completely isolated server outside of anybodies jurisdiction?  That doesn't concern you, that your selection for President has no regard for the laws that she would gladly lock you away with for life for breaking?    Sorry but that's a stupid way to look at things.

As for Reagan -- I wasn't aware he was running.  He is in no way relevant to this discussion, but a classic strawman argument never hurt anybody.  By the time Contra happened it was already well into a successful presidency and the ultimate intentions of Contra were relatively pure.