Mr Puggsly said:
This is now a debate of pushing the hardware technically versus most impressive visual assets. Gears UE is impressive because it has nice looking assets, its 1080p, and can handle a fairly large number of characters models in a fire fight. It has a some rough spots and other spots that look stunning. The polished presentation pushing 60 fps during multiplayer is nice as well. Something like The Order is generally doing less but the assets look amazing, almost like you're playing a cinematic. That's a similar reason Ryse was given so much praise. That game had impressive looking assets and put many character models out at once. In the past I argued Halo 4 is one of the most technically impressive games of the 7th gen but Naughty Dog games have better looking assets. Perhaps you appreciate Bloodborne for everything its pushing on the hardware. But when we talk best graphics, thats more about how detailed the characters and environments are. Personally I feel Batman:AK is the best looking game of the gen thus far. That's an open world game with very high quality visuals. |
Ryse lacks any segnicinat particle effects imo or other next gen effects. Bloodborne has impressive assets it has bumb mapping everywhere, something i am missing in most games this gen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v28IUHY3NfI#t=2m36s
Mr Puggsly said:
Right, this guy won't lay off because he's upset I'm even saying Gears UE has impressive visuals worthy of 8th gen. Not every game needs to set a new benchmark. |
no you said UE looks better than Bloodborne







