reggin_bolas said:
A man and woman can always conceptually reproduce ipso facto. Whether an individual couple is fertile or not is irrelevant to the analysis as a whole. |
We do not live in a religious theocracy or a fascist autocracy so one group does not get to oppose their views upon everybody else. There are many cultures and religions that traditionally allowed same-sex marriages and the number is growing by the day. People like yourself should have no right to deny other cultures (like our own Native peoples) and other religious organizations what they can and cannot do. They do not care about your need for a couple to be able to "CONCEPTUALLY reproduce" because it is an asinine criteria. If being "natural" is so important to you maybe you should reconsider participating in an extremely unnatural civilization.
