By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
reggin_bolas on 30 August 2015
Edit Thread
generic-user-1 said:
reggin_bolas said:
generic-user-1 said:
reggin_bolas said:
generic-user-1 said:


for what reason?


A politically neutral state has no interest in granting same-sex couples marriage licenses. Marriage is only for the protection of the natural family to insure the safety and well being of future generations. 

and why should it be allowed to infertil people than?

Same tired argument. It's not about who can actually reproduce. It has to do about who can actually CONCEPTUALLY reproduce. A biological man and woman can at least conceptually reproduce. A man and a man can never. 

 

 

they cant CONCEPTUALLY reproduce if one is infertile.    your argument is only right for couples that CHOSE to have no children, but not if a couple is infertile...

A man and woman can always conceptually reproduce ipso facto. Whether an individual couple is fertile or not is irrelevant to the analysis as a whole.