By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran said:
twintail said:
Samus Aran said:
twintail said:

I'm obviously talking games as they pertain to ps4, x1 and wiiu only.

You're trying to make Nintendo look bad because they actually support two platforms instead of Sony who gave up on the Vita after only a year?

Besides, you included games that were available on two or more platforms, hardly exclusive... When did the definition of exclusive change to "not on Wii U/XBONE"?

As for UC Collection, hardly a new game. I got a bigger graphical upgrade by playing Xenoblade Chronicles on the gamepad instead of an HD TV than you will with UC Collection compared to the original trilogy.


...

Are Nintendo fans always so on edge? 

Ok let me rectifiy this before this gets out of hand: i wasn't saying anything bad about Nintendo. Your need to defend Nintendo here for making games for 2 platforms is just unncessary. The TC was talking about PS4 and X1. I was merely making the point that there were more games coming to the PS4 than the X1. I added Nintendo merely as a point of reference to counter the TC's point that Sony was on the losing side of exclusive games. My point was that this is not the case. If you think I was slandering Nintendo or something then please just chill out and realise I wasn't. It was a point of reference, and that only. And I am sure other ppl recognised this. 

The usage of 'exclusive'  has grown and become more dynamic over the years. You have a specific device exclusive, like Halo 5. You have console maker exclusive like Persona 5 as it only appears on PS devices but not on a single device.  You have console exclusives where the game appears on a specified console but also appears on other non-console devices (mainly PC) like Talos Principle. You get generation specific exclusives where ppl talk about a game in relation to other devices only of that generation. 

This is how we all talk about exclusives. This topic is about the PS4 and X1. We are talking only about those 2 parameters. A game that only appears on the PS4 and not the X1 makes it a PS4 exclusive in this regard because those 2 consoles are the only defining factors we are using to guage games in this topic.

 

BUT

 

since this offends you, let me rephrase this. 

PS4 has more exclusive games than X1 coming from Oct - Dec (and had more from the beginning of this year so far).

X1 has Halo 5. PS4 has Disgaea 5, Dragon Quest Heroes, and Shadow of the Beast and Tomorrow Children (both dated for this year). Even if we dont include the last 2 games there are still more PS4 only games coming than X1.

So ultimately, my point still stands. 

and your UC to XB comparison is pretty lol-worthy: as if graphics are the only thing that makes UCC different from the original PS3 games.

You were talking about companies and their exclusives not consoles.

And no the definition of exclusives has not changed, maybe to some Sony fans.

So it's not allowed for xbone games to run on Windows 10 (you know, the OS MS owns), or be Windows exclusives (xbone runs on Windows), but PS exclusives do count? Dragon Quest Heroes is on the PS3. And let's not pretend this is anything more than a musou game. Shadow of the Beast has no release date and is a reboot to a sub-par/terrible game. Shadow of the Beast and Tomorrow Children are only PSN titles anyway, and you're going to compare that to Halo 5?

So tell me, why does Dragon Quest Heroes count, but Tomb Raider doesn't?

You can spin however you want, but the xbone has 3 big games coming up for the rest of the year while the PS4 has zero.

As for the changes in UCC, taking out the multiplayer of UC 2 & 3 isn't a good thing you know. That photo mode they're adding must be quite something...


Funny how Halo:MCC counted last fall, but UCC doesn't this year?