osed125 said:
That's a no brainer...if I build a McDonalds (using my own money) I have to hire people to work on it, thus I generated 20 jobs. That's what business men do; the more money you have, the more jobs you can potentially generate. And in the case of basically all business men, they do it to generate more money, not because of the kindness of their hearts. Trump is no different. But my original point is simple, managing a country is way way waaaaaaaaaaaaaay different and complicated than managing a company, especially a power house such as the United States. Nothing that Trump has said or done gives me confidence that he can run a country. Trump will use the same taxpayer money all Presidents prior to him have used, and he will have to use that money in education, health, military, building a wall, which are things he hasn't dealth with or at least not on this scale; not talking about raw numbers only, but also the implications it will have on foreign economy, international relationships, and who knows maybe even war. |
And Obama, Hilary, Jeb Bush, Bernie Sanders, Rand Paul, Scott Walker, etc, etc have ? Please. Your logic is easily disproven by the simple fact that the only person who could possibly be 'fit' to be President under your quota is a President running for his second term.
I would say that Donald Trump, creating, running, directing an over 9-10 billion dollar global empire of that magnitude within the private sector has far more in common with being the President of the Untied States than the level of magnititude of anything these other candidates have done.
