By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Puggsly said:
bananaking21 said:

what does sony have to do with this? why are you so hell bent on bringing them into this discussion? and how am i over reacting by simply saying the video is horrible? 

im "using my head" just fine. another subscribtion for games on PS4 isnt needed. 

Why am I bringing Sony into this discusion? I guess you don't understand the video.

For $30 a year, its a cheap subscription. That's cheaper than 2 months of PS Now's subscription. Again, I'm a fan of letting consumers decide. Not letting Sony decide what's a good value. They are the same people that think a God of War III Remaster untouched for $40 is a good value.


I remember how much of consumer decision you were when MS was limiting consumer decision.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."