By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Protendo said:
@JEMC Thanks for keeping us up to date with AMD. I'm looking forward to the new card. With excellent noise levels this might be the ultimate media/gaming center card.

I'm also interested with Nvidia, but besides the recent launch of the 950, there's not much to say. Besides, this is and AMD thread, so it would be out of place.

But if you're after a media/gaming center card, I'm not sure the Fury Nano is your card for a single but important reason: it lacks HDMI 2.0. Of course that's not a problem with FullHD TVs, but if your plan it to have that card for several years and get a 4K TV, then maybe you'd be better with one the small 960 or 970 cards that do have HDMI 2.0.

Bofferbrauer said:
Up to 1000mhz for the Fury Nano is pretty rad, I was expecting more in the line of 850mhz to get the consumption down to its 175W TDP. Guess AMD will have to do some extensive cherry picking for these to achieve this.

I wouldn't hold my breath on that part, to be honest. The Fury X with the same 4096SP and 4GB, runs at 1,000MHz but has a 275W TDP and 2x8pin powr connectors.

I'd say that something closer to 700MHz or lower seems more reasonable.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.