That Giant Bomb review seems a bit too harsh. I can understand him feeling like it hasn't aged especially well (I expressed a similar opinion in this thread, though he seems to think it's aged a lot worse than I do), but it feels like he's more focused on his perception of the gap in quality between them (relative to their release date) than the quality of the present day product itself. That's fine on a personal level, but both perspectives should be considered in a review like this. At least in my opinion :p








