binary solo said:
I don't see why MS can't still get marketing exclusivity rights, especially for games with high USA/UK appeal. They'll just need to pay more for those rights. What they will never get is a multi-plat to go exclusive like RoTR. No publisher in their right mind is going to diss the PS4 user base with an existing IP. MS will have to purchase exclusive new IP, but even then publishers will want to be able to put the IP onto PC as part of the cost of missing out on seeling to that PS4 user base. Meanwhile, aside from FPS, Sony wouldn't have too much difficulty in getting console exclusivity for some existing IP if they really wanted to, or full exclusivity for new IP. I hope they don't do the former, but it wouldn't surprise me if they did that for one or two more existing IP in the future. Would be kinda karmically funny if Sony snagged console exclusivity for the next Tomb Raider game. There's a danger Sony could do that if RoTR doesn't meet sales expectations on Xb one. |
The real issue here is revenue. You see Microsoft has money, but Xbox Revenue has been in free fall since the price cut and unbundles. Thats why you see the revival of 399 and even 499 SKUs. And don't forget they did get Tomb Raider And I'm sure they paid some major cash for that. But in truth, there is nothing Microsoft can do to take the lead from Sony so why bother. Why spend a boat load of money on cash deals when you can generate more reveune from Halo, and the onslaught of bundles. There is no likely scenerio where Sony fails to beat Microsoft. Sony jcan do more with those deals than Microsoft can.