WoodenPints said:
Back in May I did a Gears marathon doing 1-3 and I also felt Gears 1 actually seems someewhat old compared to 2-3 with all the extra ploishing and improvements campaign wise and although Gears 2 took the multiplayer back 10 years and then gears 3 brought it forward 10 years the origional at the core was always the best online, With the Ultimate Edition beta the game felt so smooth and amazing and actually no lag what so ever ( yea you could aim your shotgun at someone rather than half a screen away predicting the host lag) My first impressions were "Damn how will gears 4 be able to beat this" I was that good. I also though graphical wise 2 and 3 didn't really require a remaster and their campaigns played well and I think the main reason only the origional was remade to get the hype going and get poeple back into playing the online game they loved.
|
well even though gears 1 did not age well compared to the other two, they could still benefit from a remaster, dont you think? remastering one game in a trilogy just seems like a cheap thing to do. more content is just better. youre hooking up your x1 faithfuls and assuring them that buying your console was a good choice. especially when you consider the GOW3 port on the PS4, people would look at the gears trilogy on X1, and it would have just been a way better value.
