WoodenPints on 24 August 2015
| RubberWhistleHistle said: i played this game in 2007 and i really did love its new take on the shooting genre. i did try to play it maybe 3 years ago to achievement hunt, and man the game certainly did not age well at all. the framerate was horrible and the cutscenes did not look cool anymore and were atrocious. im sure this remaster fixes all those problems, but at the same time, i STILL dont understand why they limited the remaster to just one game? why not remaster the whole trilogy? |
Back in May I did a Gears marathon doing 1-3 and I also felt Gears 1 actually seems someewhat old compared to 2-3 with all the extra ploishing and improvements campaign wise and although Gears 2 took the multiplayer back 10 years and then gears 3 brought it forward 10 years the origional at the core was always the best online, With the Ultimate Edition beta the game felt so smooth and amazing and actually no lag what so ever ( yea you could aim your shotgun at someone rather than half a screen away predicting the host lag) My first impressions were "Damn how will gears 4 be able to beat this" I was that good.
I also though graphical wise 2 and 3 didn't really require a remaster and their campaigns played well and I think the main reason only the origional was remade to get the hype going and get poeple back into playing the online game they loved.
