spemanig said:
You're making stuff up now. You seriously think that a 64gb card is suddenly going to be less than $10 just because you can't write over it? It's going to be over half off just because you can't write over it? Even if that were true, it will still be exponentially more expensive for third parties to port their games on a cart, and that would not have garnered "positive reactions" from them. No they wouldn't. The wording is always vague like that because SD card is a brand. A cartridge is not. If they were talking about carts, they would say carts. |
Yes because Read Only anything costs less to produce than Re-Writable ones... Why on earth do you think Read only discs cost a lot less than Re-Writable discs as an example? Oh and you have not been in the meeting and neither has anyone except for third parties so you have no idea why the reactions were positive to begin with... For all we know, Nintendo didn't even show the full console to begin with but rather a dev kit
Actually that is incorrect... Here is the 3ds patent: "To this card slot 62, a memory card (SD card 64 in this embodiment) different from the memory card 58 can be inserted." Granted it also says "Cartridge" in the patent somewhere but saying that they have to be vague when it comes to SD card sounds like nonsense... Unless u have another patent where u are getting your info from?
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850
