| Jimbo1337 said: I understand that you cannot vote in the presidential election and therefore cannot vote for either Hillary or Trump. If you look back at my question, I asked it in a general way. So again I ask, if you were in your country and you had the ability to vote, would you vote for a person who is currently being investigated for potentially commiting federal crimes? You have already answered yes. Would you care to change your stance or perhaps give me reasons why you would want to vote for someone like this. So in other words, you fault President Bush for doing exactly what Bill Clinton wanted to do. Is that correct? |
Wars are expensive, is my point. You can have a big army to protect your citizens but actually going to war is expensive, Clinton didn't (whether by his choice or not) so the economy under his term was very good. That might not have the been the only reason the US had a surplus not deficit in that time but it helps.
There is enough evidence in this thread to see why the lesser of 2 evils is the one not being treated as a joke. There are better Republican candidates than that.
Hmm, pie.
