The Fury said:
Can't vote. You have to consider the options of who would be the best choice even if both choices are bad. Out of the 2, one is a business man who the world sees as encentric, the other is a politician who started by being the wife of a politician. Belief has nothing to do with it, I'm sure many US Presidents want to take out threats to national security but in this case US was in essential 'peace time' during Clinton's term. I never said he was warless, just in a warless America.
|
I understand that you cannot vote in the presidential election and therefore cannot vote for either Hillary or Trump. If you look back at my question, I asked it in a general way. So again I ask, if you were in your country and you had the ability to vote, would you vote for a person who is currently being investigated for potentially commiting federal crimes?
You have already answered yes. Would you care to change your stance or perhaps give me reasons why you would want to vote for someone like this.
So in other words, you fault President Bush for doing exactly what Bill Clinton wanted to do. Is that correct?







