fatslob-:O said:
They did issue it however that does not mean they will take it as a meaningful result to steer the company to our ideal direction ... It's consumers that determine the future of a business and if Konami doesn't believe in the strength of their own many IPs like many other game publishers that do then maybe they should leave the gaming industry ... What's the point if they don't take any risks to push out a product ? Silent Hills was their next biggest IP to Metal gear yet they axed it ... There are very good reasons to doubt Konami's intentions ... |
Here is the funny part - When Kojima was fired and his team disbanded, everybody said, "I dont want SH is Kojima wont behind it, it wont be the same without his vision ", so KONAMI did just that. Kojima's name attached to the project was what all hype was about and without him and his ideas, was it worth Konami continuing something that was not going live up to expectations set by somebody not on the project. Its like finishing a painthing,movie, or sculpture without any knowing any of the intentions or vision from the starter.KONAMI is not wrong for cancelling Silent Hills.
Your right, the consumer is what decides a business future, so why is it a problem that KONAMI focus on mobile when it pulls 20 mill a month or whatever they decide to decorate their gambling toys with?
