By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JEMC said:
Eddie_Raja said:
JEMC said:

*blah*

And in that case, a 980Ti card is the best option.


You see I actually disagree completely.  If you want to play in 1080p, the 980 Ti and 390 will give you the exact same experience - even 5 years down the line.  If you want to play in 4K - 390 CF is the same price and almost twice as powerful with more VRAM.

And here I disagree with you.

At 1080p they don't give the same performance, the 980Ti is much, much faster (btw, it's hard to find reviews of these cards at 1080p. Most reviews go directly to 1440p and 4K)


There is a reason they skip to 1440p - 1080p gives the same experience.  Should the OP get excited to play at 120 FPS instead of 100 FPS on his 60 FPS monitor?   No, because there is no point.

Sure single cards are more reliable than double cards, but CF at this point scales in 99% of the games out there with ZERO frame latency problems, and in 4K there is no other option for smooth 60 FPS gameplay in the latest.  So it isn't ideal, but it is also the only option.



Prediction for console Lifetime sales:

Wii:100-120 million, PS3:80-110 million, 360:70-100 million

[Prediction Made 11/5/2009]

3DS: 65m, PSV: 22m, Wii U: 18-22m, PS4: 80-120m, X1: 35-55m

I gauruntee the PS5 comes out after only 5-6 years after the launch of the PS4.

[Prediction Made 6/18/2014]