By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jlmurph2 on 17 August 2015
Edit Thread
DerNebel said:
jlmurph2 said:


There's more people who beat Battlefield 4's campaign (49%) than ones who have gotten to rank 25. Pretty similar tasks.

http://www.trueachievements.com/Battlefield-4/achievements.htm From 85k gamers on Xbox. A Multiplayer focused console.

Believe it or not, people do see value in a single player even if it is sub-par. 

Isn't that why some gamers didn't like Titanfall? While yes, some of it had to do with content itself.

I know that there are people that care about campaigns in these games (though I do have doubts about how representative data from something like trueachievements is), but I don't really get why, if the campaigns were any good then sure but they aren't and people know that I think.

Also I think the main reason for people not liking Titanfall was lack of content, the campaign was just part of that.


I think it does a good job of giving data. There's also 40k 360 players you could add to that 85k. That's a damn good amount of people to get data from. 

When looking at comment sections like this:( http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/24/why-titanfall-has-no-single-player-campaign ) campaign seems like a really big problem with most of those gamers.