Volterra_90 said:
MegaManX said:
Why are people vilifying religion, well besides their own intolerance,, in regards to this article? It's clearly a cultural thing because the article does not mention religion at all. As a Catholic, I do not know of any other Catholics who would refuse medical attention or anything like that from anyone qualified, regardless of their race, sex, sexuality, religion or any other factor. God knows I've had doctors over the years and I never thought twice about who they were on the outside.
The real question is why go to a country and be surrounded by it's people if you wouldn't let them aid you or your family if something were to happen.
Also don't understand how people can come on here and hate on religions and lump all religions together and not take heat for it. Imagine if I lumped a race of people together with a comment, racial intolerance is no better or worse than the religious intolerance I see on these boards. |
I don't know about Catholics, but, for example, Jehova's witnesses can't do blood transfusions. I saw one of them die because his fathers were so stubborn to let him die.
|
How old was the person that died? If he/she was a minor, wanst the country justice system supposed to deny the parents decision and provide the blood transfusion? Also, was a matter of life and death or was the transfusion only to prolong he/she life for a few months? Just curious...
