Veknoid_Outcast said:
That's certainly not what I was going for, and I hope I didn't give the wrong impression. I'd like to think the OP presents a continuum of sorts between two extreme points. The last thing I want, as a moderator and a member, is to create a dichotomy between two different factions. This isn't about good versus bad or us versus the "other." It's about self-reflection. It's about thinking seriously about why we think the way we do, and why we treat others the way we do. |
sorry i didn't mean that you are doing it but i do believe it is being used on a wider basis to cause divisions between groups of people
from there both sides can be manipulated until a desired outcome is achieved
my apologies for the confusion
for example, lets say hypothetically you fund a conflict between the west and the middle east, polarising both sides more and more ( bomb those filthy arabs! / death to america! ) and it progresses on and on and on until you reach some kind of synthesis with you at the top
or you fuel the flames of animosity between races
or you fuel the flames of animosity between the sexes
or you fuel the flames of animosity between progressives and theists etc etc etc
you crack society up along several different topics and increase the separation until the pain of that separation forces the people to come together under tighter controls to ensure that the pain of separation does not happen again







