By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLAMarine said:
Sharu said:
KLAMarine said:
Sharu said:
Saeko said:

I do understand why U.S. used these bomb in a certain way.... what i don't understant its why TWO ? one single one and a warning for more should have been enough for japan to surrender, juste for this, i  call  them monster !

From Wiki:
'A uranium gun-type atomic bomb (Little Boy) was dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, followed by a plutonium implosion-type bomb (Fat Man) on the city of Nagasaki on August 9.'

So USA was testing two different types of nuclear bombs. Thats why it was two bombings.

Your reasoning is terribly flawed. Have you considered the possibility that perhaps there were two bombings because the Japanese were still not willing to surrender following the first atom bomb?

Well, maybe you need another 9/11, since you didn't surrender after the first one?

I imagine there ARE groups in the world that would love to pull off another 911-type attack and I'm sure they have their reasons.

I just mean that your logic and morals is terrible...
And tbh I don't think that the nuclear strikes was the MAIN reason for Japan surrending. As I understand military outcome after USSR start fighting in the Far East was clear for everyone.