|
Torillian said: You wanted a dialogue on that one? Seemed like a reasonable response that people should find specific writers they like to forego these issues, I generally don't post "yeah I agree" while at work because I'm busy. Did you mean that the standard should be to assume all writers are unthuthful until you specifically learn that they are not? Guilty until proven innocent basically? If so then no I disagree, but it's not really something I'd want to debate about. Regardless of the current state of the journalism industry by stance is that it is perfectly rational and normal to change one's mind when presented with new evidence and that should not be a sign of someone being untrustworthy. |
I agree.
It is easy in the game industry changes his mind because the lack of evidences from any game... a lot of game footage are not real evidence from the final game.
I can see a writer getting excited about something showed in a conference (where you made a plan to show the game the way you want to impress the public) and after that play or see the game in real action and get disapointed because it was not like what they showed on the conference.
You can say The Order always impressed me from the footage but the playable demos were always some kind disapointing... that ended not good.
Kotaku was never supposed to be serious journalism but what they do were always reliable.
