This is an interesting question. The ability to stay neutral is damn near impossible in life but in text it's literally impossible. In attempting to take a central position against the majority that are on the extreme opposites is courting double fire. If you neither agree entirely or disagree entirely then those with 'extreme' views will immediately position you at the opposite extreme. This of course builds an even stronger membership of extreme views because it takes guts to stand alone.
To take extreme emotion to make a point (yes I know it's ironic): If you love something then you are assured to have at least one side with you so it's a 1 V 1 situation, and of course the reverse is also true: If you hate something then you are assured to have at least one side with you so it's a 1 V 1 situation. Both scenarios are tenable positions and make extremes a more attractive proposition. If you take a neutral position you are likely to have a 2 V 1 situation which makes it extremely hard to maintain what you consider a tenable position. To stand alone against the norm is not easy, and it is made harder because 'sometimes' your views on something ARE the complete opposite which gives those with a completely black and white view room to criticise your stance by calling you a hypocrite.
The compartmentalisation of ideas and thoughts is a very rare ability. To be able to discuss ONE issue without someone from the extreme side suddenly bringing in another unrelated issue is the main reason forums have gotten so radicalised.
The PS5 Exists.
