| Grey Acumen said: Ratings already cater to those stupid enough to think that a 10 actually makes it a perfect game even if it has flaws, and use those scores in attempt to show that Wii have lower quality games, and that one game is better than another despite obvious differences in focus. |
So who has a chip on there shoulder? You thinking this right here, is why I started entering this thread in the first place. I have read all the reviews for GTA, and in none of them have I ever seen the word Wii. The only people threatened by GTA getting a 10, are Wii owners. (not saying all Wii owners, as I own a Wii :p). The rest of the world is just playing the game.
As for catering to the stupid, I meant people in general (with respect to your "Wii Review Channel" setup). I was meaning if you employed that system across all gaming, it would not tell the mildly intelligent anything they could not derive themselves. With that system, we would know that people who like fighting games would think SSBB is the best fighting game on the Wii. We know that. We would know that SandBox fans would find GTA4 the best Sandbox game ever made. We know that already. I never said anything about Wii games or owners. That chip is showing up again my friend.
What it would do however, is separate the scores in a manner where you don't feel threatened by a video game, and if that's what you need, then I am all for it. I just want everyone to be happy :).
